Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
June 19, 2013, 07:00:52 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Jan 9, 2012
John Beardsworth's new Lightroom site
Lightroom Solutions
27968
Posts in
5116
Topics by
2914
Members
Latest Member:
imthedamstar
The DAM Forum
Software Discussions
Lightroom
smart catalogues for model releases
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: smart catalogues for model releases (Read 634 times)
Mathew Farrell
Newbie
Posts: 21
smart catalogues for model releases
«
on:
January 09, 2012, 03:05:53 PM »
Hi all
I'm trying to figure on the best way to annotate images in my library that are available to be sent to my stock library. My two criteria are Not Commisioned and Model Released (well, two distinct locations - Released and Not Released).
The easier sounding solution which I don't like so much is to add the keyword "model released' to each image of model X and model Y and create a smart collection for "model released" keyworded images. The thing I don't like about this is future maintainance of newly ingested images (or missing stuff from the past).
The better way I've conjured is to create a smart collection that includes the names of all the released modelss. Every time I get a new release form back, I add that name to the smart collection. This seems pretty robust to me, but I'm keen on feedback, and any holes folks might be able to see in this.
Mat
Logged
Mathew Farrell
Flowstate Photography
photography.flowstate.com.au
johnbeardy
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 1813
Re: smart catalogues for model releases
«
Reply #1 on:
January 11, 2012, 12:13:10 PM »
Doesn't the second solution depend on a model release applying to all pictures of that model? Is that true? If so, it does seem more solid . How would you deal with shots where there are two or more models?
The by-photo method obviously causes more work, but isn't it liable to be more accurate / granular ?
John
Logged
Mathew Farrell
Newbie
Posts: 21
Re: smart catalogues for model releases
«
Reply #2 on:
January 16, 2012, 07:13:14 AM »
Good and accurate point John, cheers.
a "Not Released" keyword (or at least one with different spelling/words to "Released"!) would also be a smart way to get around the multiple model scenario, but I'm unlikely to follow that protocol if I'm honest with myself.
Logged
Mathew Farrell
Flowstate Photography
photography.flowstate.com.au
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General
-----------------------------
=> DAM Workshops
=> Comments about the book
=> General Discussion
=> Photo Blogs
=> GPS/ Geotagging
=> dpBestflow.org Discussions
-----------------------------
DAM Useful Stuff
-----------------------------
=> DAMuseful Video training
=> DAMuseful Software
=> DAM Useful CS3 Beta Products
-----------------------------
Software Discussions
-----------------------------
=> RAW File Converters
=> Lightroom
=> Choosing Software/Other DAM Applications
=> Aperture
=> Bridge/ Camera Raw
=> Media Pro & Expression Media
=> iView MediaPro
=> ImageIngester and ImageVerifier
=> idImager
=> Import From Camera
=> Scripting
-----------------------------
Workflow Discussions
-----------------------------
=> Multi-User Configurations
=> High Volume
=> Stock Photography
=> Wedding Workflow
=> Tethered Shooting
-----------------------------
DAM Stuff
-----------------------------
=> Loss and Recovery
=> Keywords and Controlled Vocabulary
=> Naming Issues
=> Migration Issues
=> Scans and Camera Scans
=> DNG
=> Software Discussions
=> Hardware Discussions
=> Backup Strategies and Tools
=> Data Validation
Loading...