Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
June 20, 2013, 03:05:39 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Jan 9, 2012
John Beardsworth's new Lightroom site
Lightroom Solutions
27968
Posts in
5116
Topics by
2914
Members
Latest Member:
imthedamstar
The DAM Forum
Workflow Discussions
Tethered Shooting
Tethered Corporate Headshots: Capture One w 5d?
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: Tethered Corporate Headshots: Capture One w 5d? (Read 3589 times)
bethany Bandera
Newbie
Posts: 8
Tethered Corporate Headshots: Capture One w 5d?
«
on:
August 11, 2010, 04:52:32 PM »
I avoid shooting tethered like the plague, but sometimes it's awesome and necessary. So I will be shooting with the old 5d and I'm wondering what people's experience has been with various software. A colleageague suggested Capture One but I remember thinking it was clunky and quirky back when I used it last. I love Lightroom, but is that not the most efficient program?
A couple of seconds delay between each shot is no big deal.
Thoughts?
Thanks for sharing!
Logged
BobSmith
Full Member
Posts: 239
Re: Tethered Corporate Headshots: Capture One w 5d?
«
Reply #1 on:
August 11, 2010, 05:05:53 PM »
When I first got my 5D I bought Capture One Pro specifically for tethered shooting. I do a lot of my shooting tethered and needed something reliable. I disliked most everything else about Capture One but the tethered shooting was dead reliable and the Canon software was not at that time. I shot with Capture One Pro to get the images into the computer and then switched to Bridge/ACR?Photoshop for the rest of the workflow. Since then Canon's EOS Utility has improved a lot. I use that pretty much exclusively now with both the original 5d and a 5DmkII. Probably the most efficient (fastest) way to use it is to couple it with Bridge so that the most recently shot frame is the highlighted frame in Bridge. Lightroom 3's tethering is not bad but using EOS Utility to a watched folder with Auto Import turned on is more reliable and versatile. It's only a second or so slower. With the original 5D its about 4 seconds from shutter click to an image appearing in Bridge... maybe 5 or six seconds in Lightroom using Auto Import. The camera can shoot bursts and clear the buffer at almost as fast as a modest speed card in the camera.
Bob Smith
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General
-----------------------------
=> DAM Workshops
=> Comments about the book
=> General Discussion
=> Photo Blogs
=> GPS/ Geotagging
=> dpBestflow.org Discussions
-----------------------------
DAM Useful Stuff
-----------------------------
=> DAMuseful Video training
=> DAMuseful Software
=> DAM Useful CS3 Beta Products
-----------------------------
Software Discussions
-----------------------------
=> RAW File Converters
=> Lightroom
=> Choosing Software/Other DAM Applications
=> Aperture
=> Bridge/ Camera Raw
=> Media Pro & Expression Media
=> iView MediaPro
=> ImageIngester and ImageVerifier
=> idImager
=> Import From Camera
=> Scripting
-----------------------------
Workflow Discussions
-----------------------------
=> Multi-User Configurations
=> High Volume
=> Stock Photography
=> Wedding Workflow
=> Tethered Shooting
-----------------------------
DAM Stuff
-----------------------------
=> Loss and Recovery
=> Keywords and Controlled Vocabulary
=> Naming Issues
=> Migration Issues
=> Scans and Camera Scans
=> DNG
=> Software Discussions
=> Hardware Discussions
=> Backup Strategies and Tools
=> Data Validation
Loading...