Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/content/60/9972860/html/smf/Sources/Load.php(225) : runtime-created function on line 3
Bug in filenameNew macro?
The DAM Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 22, 2020, 12:43:42 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
28033 Posts in 5147 Topics by 2903 Members
Latest Member: kbroch
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  The DAM Forum
|-+  Software Discussions
| |-+  ImageIngester and ImageVerifier
| | |-+  Bug in filenameNew macro?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Bug in filenameNew macro?  (Read 6325 times)
PatrickArnold
Newbie
*
Posts: 24


View Profile
« on: June 19, 2010, 07:06:46 PM »

Marc

I think I found a bug in the filenameNew macro

I have some settings which rename files using the following macro:

{@prefix,1,-1,_}{@datetimecurrent,1,8}_{@sequence,-4}

where prefix is set to PSA

In the Title metadata field I have the following macro:

{@filenameNew}

The NEF file _DSC6824 gets correctly renamed

PSA_20100613_1234

but the Title metadata field contains

PSA_20100613_6824

I switched to using filename numbers instead of sequence numbers.

Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
ImageIngester Pro 3.3.06

Patrick.
Logged
Jean-François Schmitz
Newbie
*
Posts: 13


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2010, 03:31:21 AM »

I noticed exactly the same issue... Have been using that macro for ages but never paid attention to this... Doh... Need to check si,ce when this went wrong...
Logged

--
Don't dream it!
Jean-François Schmitz
Newbie
*
Posts: 13


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2011, 08:24:34 AM »

Have you found a solution to this bug?
Logged

--
Don't dream it!
PatrickArnold
Newbie
*
Posts: 24


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2011, 04:09:20 PM »

Yes - I rename in IIP but do not set the title field. Instead I set the Title field to the new name using a script as the first step in my workflow in Bridge (which is where I review the download, rate the images and do any RAW adjustments).

I would *love* to get rid of that extra step in bridge. I have not retested this recently.
Logged
Marc Rochkind
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1136


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2011, 05:38:07 PM »

I will check into this.

--Marc
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!