The DAM Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2013, 03:36:43 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Jan 9, 2012
John Beardsworth's new Lightroom site
Lightroom Solutions
27960 Posts in 5113 Topics by 2914 Members
Latest Member: imthedamstar
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  The DAM Forum
|-+  Software Discussions
| |-+  ImageIngester and ImageVerifier
| | |-+  ImageVerifier Version 1.3.01 handles newer DNG images
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: ImageVerifier Version 1.3.01 handles newer DNG images  (Read 936 times)
Marc Rochkind
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1136


View Profile WWW
« on: May 09, 2010, 05:54:21 PM »

Previous versions of ImageVerifier processed non-DNG raws by passing them through Adobe DNG Converter, whereas DNGs were processed internally, using a library supplied by Adobe. The problem with this approach was that ImageVerifier couldn't handle new DNG versions when they first came out, and users had to wait for an ImageVerifier update.

Now, with Version 1.3.01, ImageVerifier processes DNGs through DNG Converter, so all you have to do to stay updated with new DNG versions is update to the latest DNG Converter, making sure ImageVerifier's Preferences are set appropriately.

Previous versions of ImageVerifier distinguished between DNGs and non-DNG raws. This is no longer the case; now they are all called simply "raws".

Because this new version hasn't been subjected to much field testing by users, treat it with caution.

To download this new version, go to:

http://ImageIngester.com

and click the Download link at the left.

--Marc
Logged

peterkrogh
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5682


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2010, 09:10:53 PM »

Marc,
Does that mean that it should now pick up any checksum mismatches?
Peter
Logged
Ketterman
Newbie
*
Posts: 8


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2010, 06:29:32 PM »

Hey Mark,

Is it normal in this version of IV for TIF files to be reported invalid when they are not?  Just ran a big batch of Derivatives and a bunch of them came back that way but open just fine.

Just bought the II/IV pack today.  Trying to jump on board.  This part of the DAM workflow wasn't something I thought much about until I was looking around a few days ago for some other info.
Logged
Ketterman
Newbie
*
Posts: 8


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2010, 06:30:15 PM »

I mean, *Marc.  Whoops.   Grin
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!