The DAM Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 25, 2013, 06:18:49 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Jan 9, 2012
John Beardsworth's new Lightroom site
Lightroom Solutions
27960 Posts in 5113 Topics by 2914 Members
Latest Member: imthedamstar
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  The DAM Forum
|-+  Software Discussions
| |-+  Lightroom
| | |-+  Keywording Questions
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Keywording Questions  (Read 939 times)
JimGoshorn
Newbie
*
Posts: 1


View Profile
« on: December 18, 2009, 12:13:22 PM »

Hi,

When it comes to keywording, how advisable is it to use Adobe's synonyms and hierarchy or is it better to just list all the keywords individually? I don't anticipate leaving Adobe's Lightroom but your book made me wonder if something better might come along at some point and if it will support Adobe's conventions.

Also on the subject of keywording, how detailed should keywords be? In other words, if I had an image of horses in a field, I would list horses and field but should I also list grass if it is not the subject of the image? How far to go is a bit confusing.

Thanks!

Jim
Logged
BKKPhotographer
Newbie
*
Posts: 17

A frugal photographer living in Bangkok


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2009, 10:34:13 PM »

It all depends on the searches you anticipate you'll want to do in the future. There is no right or wrong answer when you are keywording pictures for your personal library. Keywording for others, (e.g. a stock agency) is a separate issue.

So if you think you will need to locate pictures of grass fields in the future, as opposed, say to corn fields or wheat fields, then by all means keyword for that. There's no "too far" - a researcher may want to keyword the variety of grass in the field.

I've developed some rules for my particular interests. For example I keyword cars down to the "model" level but no further. "Ford", "Escort" but not "GL" or "Ghia". For airplanes "Boeing", "747" but not "436" or even "400".

For locations I will keyword to the street level in places I photograph often and to the city or province (state, county) level in places I visit less often. Ideally I'd replace all that with an accurate geotag and corresponding reverse-geocode data in the IPTC but that's another subject.

When you adopt a system that meets your needs consider that you'll need to apply it consistently maybe for years. So if your system is too detailed you may not have the time and energy to both keep it updated as your needs change and to apply it consistently. I find keywording new pictures quite satisfying but going back and changing keywords on old images very boring.

Regarding synonyms - I use them extensively in Lightroom as it saves a lot of time. I have guidelines for the synonyms I'll add when I create a new keyword. For example for Thailand I try to include the Thai script equivalent for place names. This helps when I export to Flickr so Thai people can more easily find my pictures. I also include common differences in transliteration from Thai to English - e.g. "Sukhumvit" and "Sukhumwit".

If you're interested I've written more about my approaches on my blog at http://bkkphotographer.wordpress.com/tag/keyword/ and http://bkkphotographer.wordpress.com/2009/09/19/my-workflow/

I hope this helps.

Ian Fuller
Bangkok, Thailand
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!