The DAM Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 23, 2013, 07:12:51 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Jan 9, 2012
John Beardsworth's new Lightroom site
Lightroom Solutions
27960 Posts in 5113 Topics by 2914 Members
Latest Member: imthedamstar
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  The DAM Forum
|-+  General
| |-+  General Discussion
| | |-+  PS comptibility on or off?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: PS comptibility on or off?  (Read 3051 times)
danaltick
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1616


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: February 24, 2009, 08:26:31 PM »

Roger,

When you create masters and flattened derivatives in Photoshop, those files should automatically inherit the metadata from the original.  I must be missing something with your workflow.  Please explain.  Thanks.

Dan
Logged

WindowsXP, ImageIngester Pro, RapidFixer, IVMP 3, ACR4, Photoshop CS4, Controlled Keyword Catalog, Canon EOS50D
rogerhoward
Full Member
***
Posts: 103


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 25, 2009, 11:40:17 AM »

No problem.

1. Capture multiple RAW files; download to computer, converting to DNG
2. Ingest into Lightroom; apply group-level cataloging - keywords, titles, copyright - to each pano's image sequence
3. Export from LR to TIFF for stitching in PTGUI
4. Output layered PSD/PSD or flat TIFF from PTGUI - at this stage, the output file has *no* metadata derived from the originals; this file becomes my "master"; ditch the temporary files created in the previous step, but save the stitching project file (which has references to the source filenames, so I can easily restitch by outputting the DNGs to TIFFs again)
5. Copy metadata from first image in original sequence to master (using an exiftool-based script), so it inherits the cataloging already done in LR on the original DNGs
6. Open master in Photoshop and complete edits;

Now I have a full-rez TIFF (layered) which has all the cataloging from the original files - if I update the original DNGs with more keywording, it's a simple process to sync it to the master.

From there on out, all derivatives are made (generally in a completely automated way) from the master TIFF, so they do inherit the metadata on down the line. I think the part I didn't explain at first is that the stitching process I use does not preserve metadata from the files into its output.
Logged

-----

Roger Howard
danaltick
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1616


View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: February 25, 2009, 01:47:03 PM »

Roger,

Thanks for the explanation.  Given your pano requirements, it does sound like Tiff is the right choice.

Dan
Logged

WindowsXP, ImageIngester Pro, RapidFixer, IVMP 3, ACR4, Photoshop CS4, Controlled Keyword Catalog, Canon EOS50D
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!