Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
May 25, 2013, 12:43:21 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Jan 9, 2012
John Beardsworth's new Lightroom site
Lightroom Solutions
27960
Posts in
5113
Topics by
2914
Members
Latest Member:
imthedamstar
The DAM Forum
Software Discussions
ImageIngester and ImageVerifier
ImageIngester Version 3.1.01 has simultaneous multi-card ingestion
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: ImageIngester Version 3.1.01 has simultaneous multi-card ingestion (Read 1098 times)
Marc Rochkind
Hero Member
Posts: 1136
ImageIngester Version 3.1.01 has simultaneous multi-card ingestion
«
on:
June 25, 2008, 06:00:59 PM »
As promised a few days ago, I've just uploaded Version 3.1.01 for OS X. Instead of a card reader next to your computer, you can now have this:
Click
here
for details. I hope to have the Windows version ready by the end of next week.
--Marc
Logged
http://ImageIngester.com
andris
Full Member
Posts: 149
Re: ImageIngester Version 3.1.01 has simultaneous multi-card ingestion
«
Reply #1 on:
June 26, 2008, 10:57:24 AM »
Wow, can't wait to try this out! Eagerly anticipating the windows version.
I saw your performance comparisons on downloading in serial vs parallel....have you tried this on a RAID? I would think that's where you might see significant improvements downloading many at once.
Thanks for continuing to innovate,
Andris
«
Last Edit: June 26, 2008, 10:59:55 AM by andris
»
Logged
Marc Rochkind
Hero Member
Posts: 1136
Re: ImageIngester Version 3.1.01 has simultaneous multi-card ingestion
«
Reply #2 on:
June 26, 2008, 11:19:38 AM »
Andris--
Do you mean RAID for the primary or backup folders?
If so, only so-called "RAID-0" would have a benefit. But that just means that the drive is faster.
--Marc
Logged
http://ImageIngester.com
andris
Full Member
Posts: 149
Re: ImageIngester Version 3.1.01 has simultaneous multi-card ingestion
«
Reply #3 on:
June 26, 2008, 12:56:33 PM »
True, I suppose you're right. I was thinking of the difference in multi-card ingestions on our capture tower with internal SATA RAID 5, and on our capture laptop importing to an external USB 2.0 drive: Huge benefit on the tower, very little benefit on the laptop
Of course the difference is the SATA, not the RAID. Silly me.
Andris
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General
-----------------------------
=> DAM Workshops
=> Comments about the book
=> General Discussion
=> Photo Blogs
=> GPS/ Geotagging
=> dpBestflow.org Discussions
-----------------------------
DAM Useful Stuff
-----------------------------
=> DAMuseful Video training
=> DAMuseful Software
=> DAM Useful CS3 Beta Products
-----------------------------
Software Discussions
-----------------------------
=> RAW File Converters
=> Lightroom
=> Choosing Software/Other DAM Applications
=> Aperture
=> Bridge/ Camera Raw
=> Media Pro & Expression Media
=> iView MediaPro
=> ImageIngester and ImageVerifier
=> idImager
=> Import From Camera
=> Scripting
-----------------------------
Workflow Discussions
-----------------------------
=> Multi-User Configurations
=> High Volume
=> Stock Photography
=> Wedding Workflow
=> Tethered Shooting
-----------------------------
DAM Stuff
-----------------------------
=> Loss and Recovery
=> Keywords and Controlled Vocabulary
=> Naming Issues
=> Migration Issues
=> Scans and Camera Scans
=> DNG
=> Software Discussions
=> Hardware Discussions
=> Backup Strategies and Tools
=> Data Validation
Loading...