The DAM Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2013, 10:15:39 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Jan 9, 2012
John Beardsworth's new Lightroom site
Lightroom Solutions
27960 Posts in 5113 Topics by 2914 Members
Latest Member: imthedamstar
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  The DAM Forum
|-+  Software Discussions
| |-+  idImager
| | |-+  IDimager V4 and Sigma SD14 RAW files and comparison to EMedia
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: IDimager V4 and Sigma SD14 RAW files and comparison to EMedia  (Read 3953 times)
snoopy
Newbie
*
Posts: 21


View Profile
« on: March 13, 2008, 08:48:21 AM »

Hi

I read here that IDimager V4 is a lot faster than version 3. I just downloaded the trial version (professional). but it takes a long time to view thumbnails of a Sigma SD14 inĀ  IDimager V4. Is there any possibility to speed this up? Are there problems with raw files of Foveon sensors?

Second question is, what are the pro and cons of both IDimager V4 professional and Express Media when compared with each other?

Thanks in advance

Dirk

« Last Edit: March 19, 2008, 08:58:28 PM by peterkrogh » Logged
havezet
Full Member
***
Posts: 176



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2008, 01:18:17 PM »

Dirk,

The Sigma RAW format is a difficult format and to create the thumbs, IDI has to invoke the DCRAW converter, whihc is so much slower compared to other RAW formats where IDI is able to extract embedded previews to create thumbs/previews. Fortunately this is a one time only operation.

Quote
Second question is, what are the pro and cons of both IDimager V4 professional and Express Media when compared with each other?

I'm afraid I'm not the person to answer this one.

Hert
Logged

Author of IDimager
http://www.idimager.com
peterkrogh
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5682


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2008, 05:38:53 PM »

Hert,
Feel free to list functions that idi can do that EM can't. 
Peter
Logged
roberte
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 289


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2008, 08:25:25 PM »

Hi Dirk,

The only one brave enough to try listing a comparison of DAM software is Calvin Hass:

http://www.impulseadventure.com/photo/flow-catalog-compare.html

As this software is changing a rapid pace any such is list is out of date almost as soon as it's published. One thing Expression Media can do that IDimager cannot is run on a Mac. A big advantage of IDimager is its scalability.

-- Robert.
Logged

havezet
Full Member
***
Posts: 176



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2008, 05:22:56 AM »

Feel free to list functions that idi can do that EM can't.

Peter,

I'll try to keep the list non technical as much as possible since the devil is often in the details. I won't mention differences in features that both offer.
I hope my knowledge of EM is still up to date so correct me where I'm wrong.

1. Versioning (managing derivative files).
This feature is unique for IDimager. With versioning you can maintain versions in a single set of images which are considered a single unique entity for the database. When you assign a keyword (catalog label in IDI terms) to one image, then that is assiginged to all images in the version set. Apart from creating version sets, you can also work with version place holders. This means that you can identify the role of each version in the version set. For instance you can define which of the versions is your print version, your web version, your mail version, etc. You are free to define as many version place holders as you like.

2. Stacking
Besides versioning IDimager also supports Stacking. With Stacking you can group images together while each image in the stack is either a single image in the database or a specific version from a version set.

3. Hierarchical catalog labels
Speaks for itself. I believe EM2 will also offer this

4. Relational keywords/catalog labels
With relational labels you can define how your keywords/catalog labels relate to each other. For instance; if John is married to Jane, then you can define a relationship between these two labels and describe their inter-relational role; e.g. John relates to Jane as Husband to Wife.

5. Area tagging
Not only will you be able to tag your images with catalog labels, but also areas/parts of your images. It is the ideal way to define parts of the image that relates to your tags, or just to describe a part of your image that needs additional information.

6. Better XMP support
IDimager is built on XMP from the ground up. IDimager is completely XMP driven and when writing metadata, IDimager will store the XMP and also map the relevant XMP data to IPTC and/or Exif where applicable.
In addition IDimager offers features to map catalog labels (read keywords) to a predefined XMP property. This way you are basically writing part of your metadata just by assigning a catalog label to the image. For instance; you have a catalog label "San Francisco". Then you can define that this catalog label should be mapped to the photoshop:City XMP property. Then when the metadata is sync'ed to the file, the XMP properties are filled in for you. When you work with David Rieck's CVK then IDimager will automatically assign the XMP properties to these catalog labels.

Apart from these benefits, IDimager offers 100% extensible XMP. This means that you can define your own XMP schema and make them part of your Image Details. Your custom properties will be written to XMP just like any other XMP property. In fact this is what eXtensible metadata (XMP) is all about.

7. GEO Catalog Labels

In IDimager you can assign a GEO location to your catalog labels. Then as that catalog label is assigned and the metadata is synced, IDimager will automatically GEO tag your images. For instance; you have a catalog label "Statue of Liberty". Since this is a fixed location you can assign a GEO location to it. Assign the catalog label and sync and your image is GEO tagged.

8. Open architecture
Nothing (and I mean nothing) is proprietary. you have full access to any information in your catalog. Either through direct database access, export features to CSV/XML, or through scripting.

9. Integration with Photo Sharing services
IDimager includes upload features for the most popular photo sharing services like FlickR, SmugMug, and ZenFolio. The upload features will also set your descriptions and keywords on the service, even if you decide not to include metadata in your images.

10. Portfolios
Apart from designing a catalog label hierarchy you can also create so called "portfolios". Portfolios contains hierarchical collections of images and are generally used to create sets of images for a specific purpose. For instance, create a portfolio for the images on the website, or portfolios that contain the customer selections for each project, etc etc

Other advantages:
a. Database size can grow up to 2 Terrabyte
b. Integrated Downloader; including features for mirroring, catalog label assignments on ingestion, initial metadata descriptions, DNG conversion, matching RAW+JPG combinations in version sets
c. 100% Unicode support
d. Better support for files on network drives (EM 2 will improve this I believe)
e. Filter scripts, Sort scripts, search scripts (if a sort feature is not available, it can be scripted; the same goes for Filtering and Searching)
f. Synonyms (I'm not sure if EM supports synonyms or not)
g. Support for Lightroom hierarchical keywords
h. Stored groups; these are stored search queries that are accessible in the Catalog Explorer as would it be a single catalog label.

I think I highlighted the most important functional differences (though I'm sure I forgot a few). Again, please feel free to correct me where I'm wrong.

(this list is based on IDimager Pro features)

Hert
« Last Edit: March 14, 2008, 05:14:21 PM by havezet » Logged

Author of IDimager
http://www.idimager.com
mphillips
Newbie
*
Posts: 8


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2008, 06:58:02 PM »

Peter

I believe that Hert has omitted the MOST important feature of IDimager from the above list.

SUPPORT and DEVELOPMENT

IDimager as a product has grown and developed in leaps and bounds compared to what I perceive was the "static"nature of Iview Mediapro and EM, especially since MSoft got involved.

The product support and responsiveness to suggestions, and their quick implementation, sets IDimager apart.

Regards

MikeP

PS. Not sure if Hert mentioned the DAM Bucket implementation in the latest version of IDimager
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!