The DAM Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 25, 2013, 12:21:26 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Jan 9, 2012
John Beardsworth's new Lightroom site
Lightroom Solutions
27960 Posts in 5113 Topics by 2914 Members
Latest Member: imthedamstar
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  The DAM Forum
|-+  Software Discussions
| |-+  RAW File Converters
| | |-+  updates in raw images to appear in dng?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: updates in raw images to appear in dng?  (Read 3215 times)
steveZ
Newbie
*
Posts: 20


View Profile
« on: October 07, 2007, 10:40:23 PM »

I have never saved as DNG before, so my question is, can I apply changes in camera raw (4.1 Mac osx) to show up in the DNG?  In otherwords, go thru raw to make things look a little better; then how to get that appearance to show up as the view state of the DNG?  Do I just make raw changes, and then jump over to the dng converter?  Seems like those changes might be lost if they are hanging around as side car files.  What about doing that with NEF files?  As you may know, NEF files automatically adjust for CA very well, so I would like my DNG's to hold that correction.
Logged
johnbeardy
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1813


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2007, 12:41:14 AM »

SteveZ (as moderator, please sign off your posts)

Yes they do hold those changes and they are reflected in the DNG, both in the xmp metadata and in the preview. That's one of the advantages of the format and workflow. If it's not happening, review the options for rebuilding the DGN previews.

John
Logged
andyj
Newbie
*
Posts: 17


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2007, 11:08:39 AM »

John,

Perhaps I interpret Steve's question slightly differently but....

Steve,

Once you have a first-time DNG then subsequent changes to the "RAW" should actually be performed on the DNG file.  I.e. the DNG file becomes your new RAW.  This means when you go back into the RAW editor with the DNG file it picks up previous changes already made on that file.  This is the point of DNG: it's (supposedly) a global RAW format (as opposed to your NEF format.)

I think if you did what you say, i.e. edit the NEF file to create a DNG, re-edit the NEF file to make other changes then yes, you would lose your first set of changes because they are not stored in the original file.

Hope I haven't confused the issue!

Andrew
Logged
steveZ
Newbie
*
Posts: 20


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2007, 08:13:55 PM »

"Yes they do hold those changes and they are reflected in the DNG, both in the xmp metadata and in the preview"

So we make initial changes in the camera raw, and then "done".  I think there is an option to embed the changes rather than side car?  Is that better for the raw converter?  Then go to converter and convert?

" think if you did what you say, i.e. edit the NEF file to create a DNG,"

I dont think you can get NEF proprietary features into DNG, most notably that CA fix, unless you save out to a tiff.  Isn't this the subject of an entire set of criticisms about proprietary formatting?
Logged
Photo_op
Full Member
***
Posts: 165


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2007, 08:14:30 AM »

When converting RAWs to DNG select the options to embed the RAW (disk space is cheap) and use full size preview. Any changes by ACR (Lightroom too) can be "saved" to the DNG without the baggage of sidecars (helps in backup and archiving). ACR and Lightroom can update the preview with any changes depending upon you particular workflow. Some other RAW converters, more or LESS, can work in the "same" fashion.  AND, depending upon your backup strategy, if "fubar" occurs, you still have your RAW NEF saved in a DNG, somewhere. See also thread-

http://thedambook.com/smf/index.php?topic=899.0


--Dave
Logged

MacPro 2.66 Dual-Core, 4 GB ram, OS X 10.6.2, Lightroom v2.6, Photo Mechanic, ImageIngester Pro, Nikon D90

davebhc71.zenfolio.com
johnbeardy
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1813


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: October 10, 2007, 08:20:15 AM »

Dave, I think Steve wanted to "embed the changes", not the raw file itself.

On that subject, embedding the raw file in the DNG is a trade off and I feel it's best avoided. While it might be handy to manage both files as one, it's pretty painful if you *ever* want to open lots of raw files in another converter that doesn't read DNG.

John
Logged
Photo_op
Full Member
***
Posts: 165


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2007, 08:51:27 AM »

Dave, I think Steve wanted to "embed the changes", not the raw file itself.

On that subject, embedding the raw file in the DNG is a trade off and I feel it's best avoided. While it might be handy to manage both files as one, it's pretty painful if you *ever* want to open lots of raw files in another converter that doesn't read DNG.

John

John-maybe I didn't understand his question OR I wasn't clear in my explanation.   Smiley

1. Embedding the RAW into the DNG is a preference. I'm assuming Adobe will be backward compatible with DNG if I ever need to extract the RAW from a DNG during my photo lift time. Currently I use all Adobe products so I agree with your contention regarding "other" converters, but it has not been an issue for me.

2. As to "embedding the changes", using ACR or Lightroom one can "save" any changes to the DNG and update the Preview. No?

--Dave
Logged

MacPro 2.66 Dual-Core, 4 GB ram, OS X 10.6.2, Lightroom v2.6, Photo Mechanic, ImageIngester Pro, Nikon D90

davebhc71.zenfolio.com
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!