The DAM Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 23, 2013, 02:03:46 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Jan 9, 2012
John Beardsworth's new Lightroom site
Lightroom Solutions
27960 Posts in 5113 Topics by 2914 Members
Latest Member: imthedamstar
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  The DAM Forum
|-+  Software Discussions
| |-+  Bridge/ Camera Raw
| | |-+  DNG & ACR
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: DNG & ACR  (Read 963 times)
scottb
Newbie
*
Posts: 22


View Profile
« on: October 16, 2007, 04:54:10 PM »

First-time poster here. I've read the book and recall that Peter recommends converting to DNG as a final step. Is there still as much of a downside to converting straight away? I prefer to use Photo Mechanic and it helps to see the ACR-true embedded JPEG over the Nikon version (or the Apple OS rendering).

Scott
Logged

- Scott
ScottBuckel
Full Member
***
Posts: 245


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2007, 05:40:25 PM »

Scott -

I do it at the end is that the conversion is rather slow and slows in the ingestion of my initial photos.  My conversion to DNG is after I have done all the meta data, corrections to the files and just before I add them to my iView catalog.  I do not shoot as often as many people in this forum, but when I do, I have lots of images to process.

Also, the DNG's slow some of the initial workflow as well (at least that I what I think I remember). 

Scott
Logged

Scott Buckel
Monrovia, CA
andris
Full Member
***
Posts: 149


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2007, 09:05:08 PM »

Converting to DNG immediately costs only time, but can pay off in other ways.  I work for a photographer who shoots high volumes, and though a single shoot can take 5+ hours to ingest and convert to DNG, the conversion time is completely worth it to our workflow for several reasons:

1)  The photographer can make her edit based on a properly rendered proof created based on the ACR defaults I will start with when adjusting. (you mentioned this one)

2)  Images that are good enough to be shown to the client in low-res/web proof form without further ACR adjustment can be converted out based on the full size JPG preview built into the DNG

3)  Our shoots often end late in the day.  Though I'm not there to start working on the images overnight, the computer is.  Starting the DNG conversion as soon as the images come back from the shoot actually _saves_ time later.  DNGs are obviously much faster to convert to web proofs for a client than original camera raw files because of the built in jpg preview.  Since the time-consuming DNG conversion was done on the front end, I can very quickly batch out the proofs and upload them almost immediately after finishing the raw adjustment work.

I should add that using Mark Rochkind's ImageIngester Pro (http://basepath.com/ImageIngester/) makes putting the DNG conversion step on the front end of your workflow completely painless:  just fill in the right bulk metadata fields, attach the hard drive containing the shoot, and go.  Great program.

Andris
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!