|
Valeria Lages
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: June 03, 2009, 04:04:05 PM » |
|
Peter,
As I do with RAW, I want to keep my old original files from camera and scanner, that's why I will convert to DNG only when exporting them.
If there is no difference edit JPEG and TIFF or converted DNG files in LR, I will still my actual workflow: I import to LR to rename and apply general metadata, keywords, caption, sort and rate. Then I export twice the files: 1) "as original" to my "original cam/scan" folder and 2) "as dng" to "original dng" folder. After this I re-import DNGs and these will be the files I will work from this moment on.
If I need I have the original files from camera and scanner. We never know what technology and software can offer in the future and having the hardware native files can be a good chance for something new.
About JPEGs: if I apply only metadata (keywords, IPTC fields and rating), without develop, am I destroying it while exporting "as original"? Each time I export/save JPEG I am destroying it, no matter if I have only applied metadata or destruction occurs only if I have made changes in the picture (colors, levels etc)? If this metadata I initially apply doesn't damage the file, I will keep JPEG as "original" because it is smaller than DNG. And then I re-import the "original_DNG" (from the second exportation) to develop and apply specif metadata. But if the firts exportation (only metadatada applied) will destroy the file, I will consider export first as TIFF (that is more universal than DNG) and second as DNG.
Does it make any sense?
Thanks,
Valeria
|