The DAM Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 21, 2017, 08:37:08 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
28031 Posts in 5146 Topics by 2907 Members
Latest Member: kbroch
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  The DAM Forum
|-+  Recent Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10

 on: June 27, 2014, 01:20:58 PM 
Started by wkmacy - Last post by Old Toad
See my post in regarding the future of Aperture.  Sad

 on: June 27, 2014, 01:19:17 PM 
Started by sharpie - Last post by Old Toad
It was reported today on the website that Aperture is being discontinued by Apple when Yosemite is released.  I talked with a couple of the top contributors to the Aperture and iPhoto Apple forums and they heard that the info was legit but not officially confirmed by Apple. We'll have to wait and see.

If true the Aperture is going the way of iDVD, iWeb and the Dodo bird.  Cry

 on: June 07, 2014, 12:10:33 AM 
Started by Menace - Last post by Menace
Finally IMatch 5 is released. After stopping support for IDimager I was looking for another software and test IMatch 5 beta . For me this is one of the most sophisticated and smart software. I am using it not only as a Photo-DAM-Software. I uses instead of Windows-Explorer, Music-DAM-Software.

If other people are still searching a DAM-Software; Trial-Version can be downloaded:

The Forum of IMatch:

 on: June 03, 2014, 08:40:29 AM 
Started by Sossity Corby - Last post by BeckyMalaria

Can you open the damaged file with another program like Photoshop?

Before assuming the problem is with my scanner, I would test if it might be something about the transfer operation from drive to drive.

Since the problem occurred after copying the file, try running a file-verification tool on it (I use ImageVerifier) before and after copying the file. Or try doing a validated transfer in the first place. What results do you get? Does the problem re-occur?


 on: May 29, 2014, 04:11:12 AM 
Started by Sossity Corby - Last post by Sossity Corby
I recently scanned my college diploma, using my epson perfection scanner, at 600 dpi, with both Adobe RGB 48 bit and sRGB 24 bit, and scanned it as tif files. These raw scans were scanned to my macs internal rotational 500 gb standard hard drive. Both quick look and preview have no problems viewing these files.

I then copied these onto my macs internal 240 gb solid state hard drive and a thumb drive, and tried to view the files with quick look, and preview, and both had trouble opening them, saying the file extension is not supported or the file might be damaged. I have tried changing the file extension name, but this does not help.

my mac has dual solid state and rotational hard drive, running 10.8.5.

I am totally baffled as to what the problem might be, I have scanned a few other certificates like this in the past, with no problems, now suddenly there is. It is frustrating, I do not want to have to rescan but if that is what is needed, I will.

anybody have any idea what might be wrong? I dont want to continue scanning other content if my scanner is bad, but it seems I am facing a time consuming process of trying to find the problem, be it the files themselves or hardware problems.


 on: May 08, 2014, 10:04:56 AM 
Started by Sossity Corby - Last post by Roelof
PDF is not a specific photo format and JPG is a lossy format...
So, i would go for the highest quality scan first and make (lossy or not) deriatives from it later.
When you scanner can make DNG's that would be nice, else stick with Tiff

 on: May 05, 2014, 02:54:07 PM 
Started by Sossity Corby - Last post by Sossity Corby
Opps, for got to sign


 on: May 05, 2014, 02:53:23 PM 
Started by Sossity Corby - Last post by Sossity Corby
I have some scans I made as jpgs, and would like them also in pdf format. I have adobe acrobat professional, where I can add my jpg scans and make a multipage pdf.

Adobe acorbat pro also can make jpgs and tifs from pdf scans.

Is there any quality loss or change when going from one to another? what about file sizes going from one format to another?

which is better to begin scanning in? pdfs & then make jpgs if needed with adobe? or jpgs 1st & then add them into acrobat for pdfs?

Would there be much difference in quality or size if I made pdf files from my jpg scans in acrobat? how would this compare to scanning the pages again as pdfs? this would be more time consuming, and it would be more convenient to just take the jpgs into acrobat and make jpgs from them.

I would also like to know if there would be much difference if I scan pages 1st as pdfs and make jpgs from them with acrobat? vs scanning the pages separately again as jpgs?

 on: March 30, 2014, 11:46:28 PM 
Started by havezet - Last post by havezet
Today Photo Supreme 2.1 is released. Now also available in Portuguese; Bem-vindo

You can read up on the latest changes here:


 on: March 30, 2014, 11:43:15 PM 
Started by havezet - Last post by havezet
I'm proud to announce the release of Photo Supreme 2.1. Photo Supreme is cross platform, single and multi user Digital Asset Management software.

Photo Supreme already offered support for SQLServer and the new release also adds support for the popular open source database system PostgreSQL.


Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!