The DAM Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 22, 2013, 01:02:06 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Jan 9, 2012
John Beardsworth's new Lightroom site
Lightroom Solutions
27960 Posts in 5113 Topics by 2914 Members
Latest Member: imthedamstar
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Software Discussions / Media Pro & Expression Media / Re: Phase One buys Expression Media - updated on: May 28, 2010, 12:06:40 AM
I want to add my 2 cents for keeping and even expanding file formats. Most photos we take are part of a larger project. There is no living with just photo files. One example would be multimedia projects. These will include lots of different photos of course, some amount of video and then word docs that supply the text for titles, biographies, content etc., vector graphics as well as pdfs from different artists, sometimes html pages and links to research, and then the Flash or Director files. It is more than useful to be able to have all the files for a project findable years after.

Andy
2  Software Discussions / Lightroom / Re: Major problem with LR, please help! on: December 09, 2009, 07:27:07 PM
I may be way off  base here, but something similar happened to me a long time ago (so now a vague memory).

The problem was that I had no images in the root folder, and Lightroom therefor refused to do anything with that folder (other than delete it and some other things I can't remember). Once I put an image on the root I was able to 'relink' that folder to the new location and all subfolders went with it.

Andy
3  Software Discussions / Choosing Software/Other DAM Applications / Re: Anyone using LightboxPhoto on: October 16, 2009, 04:15:15 PM
Hi Bob, thanks for that last extra post, which brings up another question:

Reading that last set of forum posts, it appears that Lightbox is not open to users working on its code. ImageFolio on the other hand boasts about the openess of their PHP based DAM. Is that really the case? It strikes me that I might lilke the ability of being able to hire a local programmer to fix or upgrade my DAM should its company decide to wander off in a southerly direction.

Thanks, Andy
4  Software Discussions / Choosing Software/Other DAM Applications / Re: Anyone using LightboxPhoto on: October 14, 2009, 05:45:57 PM
Thanks so much Bob, that was great ...Andy
5  Software Discussions / Choosing Software/Other DAM Applications / Re: Need Recomendation for DAM software on: October 14, 2009, 04:30:27 PM
Thanks everybody for the various links to vendors in this thread. Funny how we all seem to be on the same wave at the same time. At the museum here we are finally starting to look at setting up an 'enterprise' level image database for the whole museum. I'm deathly afraid of it as what I've seen the artifact guys go through with their 'enterprise' level databases several times now is hair raising. Tons of money paid out and then it doesn't work as advertised and no-one wants to use it.

So a couple of thoughts if I may:

-ImageFolio, despite what I'm now hearing about the company's flakiness is written in PHP I believe. This should mean a fair number of programmers available in the community that could work on it even if the company itself goes south. Is this a correct assumption?

-Portfolio 9 looks really good in a lot of ways. Does anyone have first hand experience with it? Will it be capable of large collections in the hundreds of thousands?

-Lightroom as the initial ingesting, image manipulating/correcting and keywording tool for all photographers. Then feed this to something like MediaBeacon or ImageFolio which would pick up the xmp data and feed it to the 'masses'. Does that workflow seem reasonable or am I missing something?

Thanks so much, Andy



 
6  Software Discussions / Choosing Software/Other DAM Applications / Re: Anyone using LightboxPhoto on: October 14, 2009, 03:12:12 PM
Hi Bob

If you don't mind, what were your problems with ImageFolio? I was just now (literally ..weird how that goes) looking at their site thinking it looked like possibly good stuff. Price was right, interfaced with a SQL database, unlimited users, admin access controls etc.etc.

You imply customer support problems -does that mean software didn't work as described, sporadic problems or?

And did you try other databases such as Cumulus or Portfolio?

Thanks so much, Andy
7  Software Discussions / Media Pro & Expression Media / Re: Switching locations of source files on: May 04, 2009, 06:13:53 PM
This is pretty late to this thread....

but had similar problem when the source drive got moved. What solved it was making a new catalog and then importing the original catalog into it.

Andy
8  Workflow Discussions / Multi-User Configurations / Re: Software to consider at this point in time? on: January 12, 2009, 03:54:58 PM
Sorry to take so long to reply:

>Peter asked: Glad to hear that's working. What kind of business is this in?

I work in a museum. They have a huge database for their artifacts but only images of the artifacts themselves are stored in this database. They resist the idea of calling an image an artifact in its own right. Therefor all other images such as those of exhibits, field trips, brochure and poster shots, production documentation, special events etc. are cataloged in xMedia. This is for two reasons:
 1) There is no funding for another expensive database (it's amazing how much money can be sunk into one of those enterprise size databases, especially when you factor in all the training, consulting, database management and IT upkeep they involve)
2) No-one on staff wants to learn more operating procedures of another complicated asset management program. The interface and ease of use of a program, especially for people who will not be working with it every minute of the day and for that matter maybe only once a month, is of crucial importance. We've already gone through one other enterprise style database that was eventually turfed because it was so obtuse that everyone was just spending their time finding ways to not use it.

>Peter asked: The other drawback is that as individual users look through catalogs, they can't add their organizational information back.

This would have been great but often it can actually be a benefit that they can't. Not everyone thinks about the information the same way and people sometimes write in the weirdest things (going back to an earlier database where you wrote things into fields). It depends on what they think is important and often they do not look at it from the point of view of a person doing the searching. This can make search results very inconsistent.

>Chip asked: Aniemann, do I understand correctly that you maintain two copies of each file?  One in the locked folder and one in the distribution folder?

Yes. Two copies of the database file. The data entry person works with the unlocked version and the rest of the staff always view the locked version. Because the editted file is automatically copied it doesn't feel complicated. However this can be a nuisance when someone else that's an expert in their field should also be editting the info and have to be given write access.

What we are doing with xMedia is definately a workaround but I don't see a better solution for us for now. My ideal would fit the following criteria:
- a centralized server style database that was as easy to use as iView/xMedia,
- did not need speciallized IT skills to install and manage,
- did not cost such an exorbitant amount,
- was produced by a company that has a good chance of being around for a while
- had as large an information/user base as iview/xMedia so we wouldn't need to always hire expensive consultants to come figure things out for us.

 Wink  ....I don't want much, Andy




9  Workflow Discussions / Multi-User Configurations / Re: Software to consider at this point in time? on: December 31, 2008, 05:30:04 PM
We use xMedia in a multiuser environment by having read only distribution copies of catalogs in a separate read only folder on the server. Any number of users can access these read only distribution catalogs at the same time. Data entry and editting versions of these catalogs are kept in a separate locked folder and copied from there to the distribution folder at regular intervals.

We need only a few full licenses. Most users have the reader which is free.

There are benefits:
-price is a big one, as any other approach will, I believe, cost upward of $10,000 and require more IT type management.
-no special server administration skills required
-only one person does the data entry which keeps it consistant
-the xMedia interface is still one of the easiest to use for casual users (I believe this to be a bigger issue than is often given credit)

Drawbacks:
-with many images you end up having to split collections across several catalogs which makes upkeep and searching awkward

Andy
10  Software Discussions / Media Pro & Expression Media / Re: Expression Media 2 on: May 30, 2008, 10:12:10 PM
Just found another reason to go to XM2.

We just replaced our network storage that has all the images on it with a newer drive. The old drive was mapped as T:, and the iViewand XM1  catalogs all pointed to the images on T:.  No problems.

Now the new drive is a mirror of the old drive and has been installed in its place. It has been given the same name and IP address and is also mapped to T:.   XM1 refuses to see the images on this new drive!   

XM2 however has no problem with the new drive and everything works fine with it. 

Andy
11  Software Discussions / Media Pro & Expression Media / Re: Expression Media 2 on: May 22, 2008, 11:28:58 AM
XM2 has definately been worthwhile upgrade for us.

We have a large variety of files and iView would always hang and crash when it hit files it didn't like (such as some large tifs etc.). So you had to go through the various folders manually and try to avoid the files that wouldn't import. Building a catalog was painful.

XM2 breezes through no problem now. I can just point at a folder and let 'er rip.

Andy
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!