The DAM Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 25, 2013, 05:19:58 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Jan 9, 2012
John Beardsworth's new Lightroom site
Lightroom Solutions
27960 Posts in 5113 Topics by 2914 Members
Latest Member: imthedamstar
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  DAM Stuff / Scans and Camera Scans / Re: Camera Scan Lighting on: January 08, 2010, 08:25:03 AM
Peter,

In your experience, would you expect that a 640 W/s unit (Alien Bees B1600) would have enough power for a softbox + baffle + plexiglass triple diffused lighting set-up? With your 800 W/s unit are you in the middle of the power range or near the high end?

Thanks,

John
2  DAM Stuff / Scans and Camera Scans / Re: Camera Scan Hardware on: January 08, 2010, 02:15:49 AM
In case anyone is interested, here is a view of the rig I am playing with now.  Very similar to Peter's using a Nikon PS-5 stage and major RRS parts, but using a 100mm macro (on full frame). I took advantage of a few RRS parts I had in the drawer.

John



also here are photos of the PS-5 as stock and disassembled





and undergoing modification to remove flange


John
3  DAM Stuff / Scans and Camera Scans / Re: Equipment Questions on: January 06, 2010, 10:07:26 PM
I don't have any experience with the 60mm macro, but understand it is a very sharp lens, and as mentioned does 1:1.

I use a 100mm macro on a full frame body, and get essentially a full frame of the slide (minus the area cropped off by the slide mount). A 60mm macro on a 1.6x body has a field of view equivalent to 96mm on full frame. That should be pretty close to getting you a full frame.

The difference between 50mm and 60mm on a 1.6x crop body is larger than you might think.  The 50mm lens has a full frame field of view equivalent of 80mm vs. 96mm for the 60mm lens.

Before you buy one, you might rent one and try it for a week.

http://www.lensrentals.com/rent/canon-60mm-f2.8-ef-s-macro/for-canon

John
4  DAM Stuff / Scans and Camera Scans / Re: Equipment Questions on: January 06, 2010, 06:55:48 PM
For a 1.6x crop body, you might consider the Canon 60mm EF-S macro.
5  DAM Stuff / Scans and Camera Scans / Re: Camera Scan Lighting on: January 05, 2010, 08:08:09 PM
Thanks for the reply.

 The color sensitivity I was referring to relates to how diffuse the light is.  More diffuse light seems to give better color accuracy.  I am going to invest in a decent flash head for this work, and was interested in what others are using.

Thanks again.

John
6  DAM Stuff / Scans and Camera Scans / Camera Scan Lighting on: January 05, 2010, 07:29:31 PM

For my own work, I use one with the diffuser removed. I don't want a piece of dust to show up in a lot of images.

It does mean that you need to make sure the light is well-diffused.  I've found the need to triple-diffuse my strobes - A softbox with a baffle, and then a piece of milk plexiglass between the softbox and the film stage a foot or so back).


Hi Peter,
 
I have a few questions about you lighting.  I have found the lighting set up to be very critical in terms of getting accurate colors, and I wanted to see what exactly you were using? How many watt-seconds?, what size softbox?, set-up how far away?, etc.  Any chance you have a photo of your lighting set up?

Thanks!

John
7  DAM Stuff / Scans and Camera Scans / Re: Camera Color Profiles for Duplication? on: December 26, 2009, 02:18:07 PM
Thank you for the reply Peter.

I was thinking about shooting a GMB ColorChecker as well.  I have not shot a roll of film in 5 years, but I think Kodachrome can still be processed by Dwaynes till 12/30/2010. The 12/31/2009 date was for mailers (I think)?

I agree about film formulas changing over time, I can see that with different batches of Kodachrome within the same year.

John (sorry I forgot to sign the last post)
8  DAM Stuff / Scans and Camera Scans / Camera Color Profiles for Duplication? on: December 24, 2009, 11:47:54 AM
I am getting OK colors in the camera duplication of Kodachrome slides, but some aspects of the color are off in subtle ways that are not simply an adjustment to white balance (yellow-blue) or tint (green-magenta). Has anybody developed any camera calibration methodology for Lightroom or Adobe Camera Raw?   I'm using Lightroom 2.6 for RAW conversion and a Canon 1Ds Mark III for duplication with a 100mm macro and a strobe for illumination.

 I tried duplicating a Kodachrome IT-8 scanner target and then eyeballing changes to the R, G, and B channels using the "camera calibration" tab in Lightroom. Here is an example before and after tweaks:



here is the same target with the same white balance but with increased saturation in the R, G, and B channels using "camera calibration" in Lightroom



Here is an example image from a Kodachrome 25 original, colors are nearly perfect except that the yellow lettering and flowers are much too pale. I would like to develop a camera profile that can give more accurate colors without having to make extensive solor adjustments that are unique to each image. Any suggestions? Thanks.



9  DAM Stuff / Scans and Camera Scans / Re: Camera Scan Hardware on: December 13, 2009, 02:29:19 PM
Another question.

Is there any reason to keep the frosted plastic diffuser in place vs. removal and shooting at a white background lit with a flash? Thanks.

John
10  DAM Stuff / Scans and Camera Scans / Re: Camera Scan Hardware on: December 13, 2009, 02:21:56 PM
Thanks for the reply Peter.

Now that I have a Nikon PS-5 in-hand, I can see the mods are indeed trivial.
11  DAM Stuff / Scans and Camera Scans / What Lens? on: December 08, 2009, 07:42:38 AM
What are the relative merits of using a 50mm focal length vs. a 100mm focal length for the purposes of camera scans? The set-up length will be shorter and more convenient with the 50mm, but what about the image quality?  Any differences?

Thanks,

John
12  DAM Stuff / Scans and Camera Scans / Re: Camera Scan Hardware on: December 07, 2009, 11:06:16 PM
Hello, a few hardware questions.

Can you elaborate on the modifications required to use the PS-5? What exactly are the modifications (e.g. drilling/tapping etc.)?

Also, if using the Canon 100mm 2.8L, would the 18 inch MPR be the appropriate rail? Thanks!
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!